All About the Bra Band: It’s Cantilevered!

For part two of my exploration of the bra, an in depth look at the bra band, its relationship to cup size, and its role in complicating everything about finding a bra that fits. 

The bra band is really the base of the bra. It’s where the vast majority of the support comes from, and the support it provides is cantilevered horizontally from the close fitted band and the cups holding the weight of the bust up, rather than support by suspending weight from the shoulders, which hurts and doesn’t work very well. 

vertigo cantilevered bra
Oh, yes, Jimmy, it is a veritable marvel of modern engineering.

The bra band also establishes circumference of the torso at the underbust (for simplicity, I’m disregarding for a moment the way that the old plus four inches issue muddies the waters for certain sizing systems). Bra band size is the starting point for how we describe bra sizes. Cup sizes are relative, and the letters actually have no meaning without a bra band to give them context. Even though we talk about double Ds or B cups as if they describe an objective size, they actually don’t mean anything, because they are relative to the band size that defines them. Here’s a better visual explanation of how cup size relates to torso/band size:

The way that we write bra sizes as a numerical value and a letter is kind of like a little math equation where the bra band is the base circumference of the body at the underbust, and each letter increase adds an inch to this to end up with enough room for the circumference of the bust at the fullest point:

AA = .5 inch

A = 1 inch

B = 2 inch

C = 3 inch

D = 4 inch

DD or E = 5 inch

And upward, though the specific letters used sometimes vary from manufacturer to manufacturer or European system versus American sizing system, etc. If you wrote it as a math problem, it would be something like this: 

Numerical band size/underbust circumference + letter to specify extra cup inches = full bust circumference

So for a 36B, it’s basically an equation that says: 36″ rib cage + 2″ total added in the cups = 38″ full bust measurement. This is why sister sizing works, where you can go down a band size but a cup letter, or up a band size and down a cup letter, to approximate a fit like your exact size (more on this another day).  

This sounds simple enough, but then everything gets complicated, because A) different fabrics are reduced by different amounts depending on stretch and recovery properties, so a band designed for a 36″ rib cage probably will measure smaller than that, B) all bodies are not the same and the broad backed and non-standard torso-ed among us (*raises both hands*) are statistical outliers who can’t find an appropriate size this way, and C) the plus 4 phenomenon.

The plus four thing is an often repeated piece of advice bra fitting – take your actual rib cage measurement, if it’s even, add four inches, and if it’s odd, add five inches to get your band size. To me, this seems illogical and stupidly complicated, and it seems more intuitive to just use your actual rib cage measurement. There are interesting historical reasons that this developed that I’m reading up on and will write about, but it seems to have been a vanity sizing tick that happened around the ‘50s or ‘60s when bra sizing as we now know it began to emerge as an industry standard. Things get really, really complicated these days, because sizing standards vary by market (American, UK, EU, Japanese, Australian, to name a few), and because in the US market, some companies no longer add these inches into the band sizes, and some companies do. This means a 36 band brand A might not be drafted for the same rib circumference as brand B, so your 36B is not the same size across brands. For those of us who don’t want to try on 37 bras at the mall to find one with a good fit, this is exasperating.

This isn’t exactly the bra manufacturer’s fault, since it is very hard to accommodate the wide range of bust shapes, sizes, and body proportions that exist in the real world into a single approximation. It’s a complicated supply/demand and consumer knowledge problem. Even if there were more variations available, most of us (my pre-lingerie-addiction self included) would not know where to begin to understand our particular shape and support needs. That being said, some kind of standardization on band measurement seems to me like it would make it much easier for all of us. (In my own drafting and bra sizing, I use an exact rib cage measurement as a starting point, since the plus four model assumes a certain standard tapered rib cage typical of more of an hourglass shape than the vast majority of women have. Statistically most of us are much more rectangular.)

I’ll be rambling about bust position next in my sprawling Ted talk on the mechanics of the bra. 🙂 I’d love to hear any thoughts, and if anyone knows more about the weird history of bra size standards, I’d love to hear more on this.


7 thoughts on “All About the Bra Band: It’s Cantilevered!”

  1. I was reading up on this myself a few weeks ago. I refuse to understand the logic about “plus 4” or whatever. I refuse to try on 40 bras just to find what fits. I have found something recently that is alright, but I am still not sure if it fits right. I’ll be watching for your next post!

    1. I agree completely! I feel the same way about dress sizing, really. Just using actual measurements would reduce so much confusion across the board.

  2. My ex (a civil engineer) used to explain the wonders of the strapless bra by analogy with the flying buttress. I’ve learned about cup size from your post, thank you! I think the most important thing about a new bra is the person who fits it. Without an expert you might as well buy from a lucky dip.

  3. You are right about many women being more rectuangular, in a sense, than hourglass shaped. I got quite a shock when I viewed the drape based on my custom made dress form. I am quite a rectangle with small dart intake. Finding the perfect–or even close–bra size has been difficult because of sloping shoulders and a chest that slopes inwards until it comes to the small bustline. How do you fit the bras you make for different sizes? Do you use a form?

    1. I seem to have had two very long winded responses that I wrote to your comments disappear when I hit send, so apologies if your inbox is bombarded with stuff, lol. To make my previous long story short, no, I tried making a custom duct tape form, and while it was very helpful in understanding the shape and planes of my body, it was a heavy, weird, not inspiring thing to work with, so now I just drape on a 36b mannequin and adjust using my pattern slopers. I’m very rectangular, too, and broad backed, with a build that resembles more of a small masculine build with boobs than a typical feminine dress form. There is also a press and seal plastic wrap that I tried making a bust form with, but even that wasn’t more accurate than what I ended up with from pattern experimentation. But for sewing for others, I’ve usually done a mockup, since most people wear a different size than they think they do, and because the best part of having a bra made for you is that you can adjust for personal fit needs. This is what I plan to do for underwired bras when I offer them on Etsy, too, since I’m a super small hobbyist business at the moment, and I’d rather sew carefully for a few people who are very happy with the fit than just make more meh fitting bras in a world already full of them. 🙂

      1. I will be on the lookout for the underwire ones. I love what you already have but my needs are for more uplift. Also, I like the feeling of support that underwire and boning (if used) provide.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s